New Book Review Postings

Your new assignment is to write a book review on a book you have recently read. Use the reviews here as guides (what to do or what not to do) and make sure you check your writing before you post for grammar and spelling.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Advice from Mr. King

When Mr. King asks himself what writing is, his answer is, “telepathy, of course”; and his book, On Writing, is even better than telepathy. When I was reading this book I didn’t feel like King sending me images telepathically, I felt like he was right in the room talking to me. On Writing is one of the few non-fiction novels written by Stephen King, one of the most, if not the most, prevalent horror authors of our time. King has authored more than 40 books and 200 short stories in the last thirty-five years. On Writing is half a memoir of King’s life and half a how-to book on writing. The first half of the book is about King’s life, his childhood, unfortunate accidents with poison ivy and his run in with the otiologist, how he became a writer, and his later life. The second half is about how to become a better writer, even though King explicitly states,

“[…] it is impossible to make a competent writer out of a bad writer, and while it is equally impossible to make a great writer out of a good one, it is possible, with lots of hard work, dedication, and timely help, to make a good writer out of a merely competent one.”

The entire book is written in this down-to-earth, completely candid style. King doesn’t flatter his reader, he tells it to them straight, so if you are easily discouraged or offended, this might not be the book for you. However if you are up for a good laugh you are in the right place because the entire book is dripping with Stephen King’s trademark dry wit and self-deprecating humor.

Also this book gives a lot of excellent advice on life, and on writing. Small gems of wisdom like on topics like criticism: “After having a two-hundred-pound babysitter fart on your face and yell Pow!, The Village Voice holds few terrors”, fancy language: “Never use “emolument” when you mean “tip””, the importance of reading: “If you don’t have time to read, you don’t have the time (or the tools) to write”, television: “I am, when you stop to think of a it, a member of a fairly select group: the final handful of American novelists who learned to read and write before they learned to eat a daily helping of video bullshit”.

So, if you want to learn more about Stephen King, read this book. If you are sick of boring handbooks on writing and want to learn a bit about writing in a funny and entertaining style, read this book. If you are offended by four letter words, do not read this book. Overall, this book was hilarious and helpful, but not for the feint of heart!

3 comments:

tizzy... one who loves all said...

i was impressed by how much i liked this book review. It expressed many points that I felt were true for example: where it states that it is like stephen king is in the room talking to you, is exactly how I felt when I was reading the book.

Ickabod Finn the Great and Supreme- said...

Some of this was covered in class, but I'm going to use it in this review. This review is definitely the type to make someone want to read the book. Your enthusiasm is quite apparent and infectious. The downside about that is that the review is a bit biased and doesn't give very good negatives on the book. It seems to be based almost entirely on opinion and that enthusiasm.

OMG, WE'RE WRITING REVIEWS ABOUT REVIEWS!!!1 WHO'DA THUNK!?

Pamela Chodosh said...

Actually these might seem like reviews on reviews, but the comments should be more like feedback so when the author is revising, he or she will have something besides his or her own thoughts to go on. Feel free to offer more extensive ideas for revision.